Liliane Touraine, for Politiques’Art et Exporevue

The argument is surprising and comical: surprising by this predisposition to an expression by alexandrines and funny by the recourse to the principle of paradoxical contrast since this “Beurette” speaks in a French language so chastised that it is no longer current. Her language is more refined, more culturally “French tradition” than that of the members of the French family (pure wool, Quebecers would say) who receives her. It is a creative argument in its treatment against prejudice, which can be applied to many other situations where an individual is only seen through the collective of the social class or the country from which he comes. In this way, the subject touches on the timeless, the universal.

Cécile Stroud, for Artistik Rezo

The argument is surprising and comical: surprising by this predisposition to an expression by alexandrines and funny by the recourse to the principle of paradoxical contrast since this “Beurette” speaks in a French language so chastised that it is no longer current. Her language is more refined, more culturally “French tradition” than that of the members of the French family (pure wool, Quebecers would say) who receives her. It is a creative argument in its treatment against prejudice, which can be applied to many other situations where an individual is only seen through the collective of the social class or the country from which he comes. In this way, the subject touches on the timeless, the universal.